In political theory, two contrasting approaches to governance are consociationalism and centralism.
Consociational governance refers to a model where political power is deliberately shared among distinct social groups—such as those divided by ethnicity, religion, or language. It often includes mechanisms like group-based representation, mutual vetoes, segmental autonomy, and coalition governments to ensure each group participates in state decision-making.
Centralist governance refers to a system where political authority is concentrated in a single, unified central government. Decision-making power is held primarily at the national level, and regional or local units have limited autonomy. Centralist models typically emphasize uniform policies and institutions across the entire state. Both models are used around the world in varying forms depending on a country’s historical, social, and political context.